{rfName}
Eu

Indexed in

License and use

Citations

1

Altmetrics

Analysis of institutional authors

De La Peña MarCorresponding Author
Share
Publications
>
Article

Eusebius and alcuin on constantine and charlemagne as wise rulers: Sapiential rulership in late antiquity and the early middle ages

Publicated to:Espacio, Tiempo Y Forma, Serie Iii, Historia Medieval. (34): 881-913 - 2021-07-01 (34), DOI: 10.5944/ETFIII.34.2021.30050

Authors: De La Peña MAR

Affiliations

Univ CEU San Pablo, Madrid, Spain - Author
Universidad San Pablo-CEU - Author

Abstract

Keywords
alcuin of yorkcarolingian empirecharlemagnechristian roman empireconstantine the greatemperoreusebius of caesareawisdom theologyworldAlcuin of yorkCarolingian empireCharlemagneChristian roman empireChristianityConstantine the greatEusebius of caesareaSapiential rulershipWisdom theology

Quality index

Bibliometric impact. Analysis of the contribution and dissemination channel

The work has been published in the journal Espacio, Tiempo Y Forma, Serie Iii, Historia Medieval due to its progression and the good impact it has achieved in recent years, according to the agency Scopus (SJR), it has become a reference in its field. In the year of publication of the work, 2021, it was in position , thus managing to position itself as a Q1 (Primer Cuartil), in the category Classics. Notably, the journal is positioned above the 90th percentile.

From a relative perspective, and based on the normalized impact indicator calculated from World Citations from Scopus Elsevier, it yields a value for the Field-Weighted Citation Impact from the Scopus agency: 1.25, which indicates that, compared to works in the same discipline and in the same year of publication, it ranks as a work cited above average. (source consulted: ESI Nov 14, 2024)

Specifically, and according to different indexing agencies, this work has accumulated citations as of 2025-05-20, the following number of citations:

  • Scopus: 1
Impact and social visibility

From the perspective of influence or social adoption, and based on metrics associated with mentions and interactions provided by agencies specializing in calculating the so-called "Alternative or Social Metrics," we can highlight as of 2025-05-20:

  • The use, from an academic perspective evidenced by the Altmetric agency indicator referring to aggregations made by the personal bibliographic manager Mendeley, gives us a total of: 1.
  • The use of this contribution in bookmarks, code forks, additions to favorite lists for recurrent reading, as well as general views, indicates that someone is using the publication as a basis for their current work. This may be a notable indicator of future more formal and academic citations. This claim is supported by the result of the "Capture" indicator, which yields a total of: 1 (PlumX).

With a more dissemination-oriented intent and targeting more general audiences, we can observe other more global scores such as:

  • The Total Score from Altmetric: 1.
  • The number of mentions on the social network X (formerly Twitter): 1 (Altmetric).

It is essential to present evidence supporting full alignment with institutional principles and guidelines on Open Science and the Conservation and Dissemination of Intellectual Heritage. A clear example of this is:

  • The work has been submitted to a journal whose editorial policy allows open Open Access publication.
  • Additionally, the work has been submitted to a journal classified as Diamond in relation to this type of editorial policy.
Leadership analysis of institutional authors

There is a significant leadership presence as some of the institution’s authors appear as the first or last signer, detailed as follows: First Author (RODRIGUEZ DE LA PEÑA, MANUEL ALEJAN) and Last Author (RODRIGUEZ DE LA PEÑA, MANUEL ALEJAN).

the author responsible for correspondence tasks has been RODRIGUEZ DE LA PEÑA, MANUEL ALEJAN.